Table of Contents
- 127-A End Closure
- 127-B Door Edge Cutouts
- 127-C Frame Cutout Limits
- 127-D Electric Strikes & Electric Hinges in Stud Walls
- 127-E Prime Painted Materials Alert
- 127-F Butted Frames Rough Opening Sizes
- 127-G Environmental Considerations Relating to Factory Painted Steel Doors and Frames
- 127-H Water Penetration
- 127-I Grouting Frames in Drywall
- 127-J Back-Coating of Frames
- 127-K Improper Wedges as Hold-Opens
- 127-L Buyer Beware: Steel Doors with Lead-Based Primer
End Closure Location
The steel door industry utilizes a variety of end closure designs in standard doors. The most common are flush type end closures or inverted end closures. The inverted (legs upward) end closures in many cases may create a necessity to reposition the mounting holes for regular arm closures or surface overhead stops/holders. To avoid interference with the “web” of the top end closure channel, mounting screws must be slightly repositioned.
A similar (but less serious) situation could occur when channel-shaped closer reinforcements are inserted into flush type end closures. The additional layers of material or the joint itself could cause “creeping” of the drill bit or tap.
Illustrated below is the consensus of the Steel Door Institute members showing the location of these channel conditions on standard steel doors.
It is suggested that the hardware manufacturer and/or hardware consultant be contacted for resolution of such a conflict.
Door Edge Cutouts
The ability to form a crisp aesthetic cutout in the edge of a steel door, especially in the vicinity of a bend line is directly influenced by the steel thickness and the proximity of the cutout to the bend line. A cutout too close to the bend line will result in a flare out of the cutout area due to unevenly distributed stress along the brake die or roll form rollers.
The following illustrations are intended to convey dimensional limitations of the hardware items to be mortised into the edge of 1 3/4″ thick standard steel doors.
Certain lock fronts, concealed hinges, strikes, or electrical devices do not comply with these limitations. The resulting potential for inaccuracy or lack of aesthetics is inherent in the manufacturing processes and is not to be considered a defect.
Tolerances – All values which do not carry specific tolerances or are not marked maximum or minimum shall have the following tolerances: Linear dimensions shall be ± 1/16 in. (1.6 mm). Weight or force shall be ± 2%. Angles shall be ± 2 degrees. Where only minus tolerances are given, the dimensions are permitted to be exceeded at the option of the manufacturers.
Gauge vs. Thickness – While the term ‘gauge’ is no longer common for defining material thickness it is still used to specify doors and frames for ordering purposes. The term ‘thickness’ is used when defining the actual dimension of an item, and the term ‘gauge’ is used in the context of specifying a particular door or frame.
Frame Cutout Limits
The ability to form a crisp aesthetic cutout in steel frames, especially in the vicinity of a bend line is directly influenced by the steel thickness and the proximity of the cutout to the bend line. A cutout too close to the bend line will result in a flare‑out of the cutout area due to unevenly distributed stress along the brake die or roll form rollers.
The following illustration is intended to convey dimensional limitations of the hardware items to be mortised into the face, rabbet or stop of steel frames. Certain concealed hinges, strikes, or electrical devices do not comply with these limitations. The resulting potential for inaccuracy or lace of aesthetics is inherent in the manufacturing processes and is not to be considered a defect.
Electric Strikes & Electric Hinges in Stud Walls
Steel or wood stud drywall constructions methods and frame anchorage could result in interference between the stud and the electric strike or hinge. Notching the stud could result in compromising the stability of the frame and invalidating the fire rating of the opening.
Dependent on the dimensions of the strike, the cutouts may extend beyond the frame face or the returns, thus leaving critical strike parts or wiring exposed.
Consideration should be given to specifying a strike suitably sized to fit the confines of a standard 2″ face frame or specify an alternate frame profile with larger frame faces that will accommodate it.
Situations exist where the preparation for an electric strike or hinge does not allow the drywall to penetrate the throat of a fire rated frame the required 1/-inch in the immediate area of the hardware. When this occurs, a penetration or joint seal (e.g. intumescent caulk) listed for gypsum wall assemblies must be applied to the affected area; thereby, sealing any potential gap and ensuring the continuity of the fire barrier.
Prime Painted Materials Alert
Prime Painted Doors, Frames, and Accessories (where applicable) shall comply with the acceptance criteria specified in ANSI A250.10-2011. Doors and frames are cleaned and treated prior to painting to ensure maximum paint adhesion. All exposed surfaces are then given a factory-applied coat of rust inhibiting “direct to metal” type primer. The primer is then baked, air dried, or otherwise cured as appropriate for the primer.
This process is intended to protect the steel surfaces for a period of time under reasonable weather exposure conditions. Factory applied primer coatings may be somewhat porous in order to accept finish coatings. The primer coating may therefore be susceptible to the action of moisture or ambient moisture condensation during shipping or storage. For example, transportation of materials in unprotected “open” trucks during inclement weather (rain or snow) or on roadways where salt or other snow melting agents are used will deteriorate the primer. Extended exposure to such conditions may result in rusted or water stained areas. ANSI A250.8-2017 (SDI-100) paragraph 4.1 presents Industry recommended jobsite storage requirements.
Should the primer become scratched, abraded, rusted or stained, the affected areas may rust unless sanded and reprimed with a suitable “direct to metal” primer containing rust inhibitors.
Prior to application of finish coats, the substrate shall be inspected by the Painting Contractor. All Architectural Specification requirements along with all requirements of the paint manufacturer shall be followed. These will generally include scuff sanding of the substrate to remove foreign materials, scratches or abrasions from construction processes, along with any special or mandatory requirements for primer touch-up or additional primers required by the paint system.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, the field applied primer and finish paint “systems” must be designed for direct to metal applications and contain rust inhibiting properties.
IF COATING COMPATIBILITY IS AN ISSUE, contact the SDI Manufacturers or their local distributors who can provide information or “sample” materials for the painting contractor’s use.
Butted Frames Rough Opening Sizes
The variety of existing wall anchors available from SDI Members allow Standard Steel Door Frames to be a reliable option for existing wall, structural steel wall framing or retrofit installations utilizing a butted to wall application. In order to make the installation successful, careful consideration shall be given to all tolerances involved and that sufficient clearance is figured to allow for them.
It has been “customary” to allow clearance around the frame perimeter when establishing rough opening sizes or when figuring non-standard overall frame sizes. This clearance is necessary to compensate for any allowable manufacturing tolerances, installation tolerances, or substrate conditions. Tolerances and clearances are referenced both pictorially and verbally in a number of Industry documents such as:
- SDI-110-18 (butted frames)
- SDI-111F-07 (existing wall anchors)
- SDI-117-19 (manufacturing tolerances)
- ANSI A250.8-2012
- ANSI/SDI A250.11-2012
- ANSI/NAAMM HMMA 840-17
- ANSI/NAAMM HMMA 841-13
Frames will “fit and function” if made to these dimensional tolerances and installed within tolerances. There is, however, relatively no assurance that the substrate (walls) will be of suitable size or alignment.
We therefore recommend that the rough openings for these cases be no less than 3/16″ larger on all 3 sides than the “intended” overall frame size. (Example: 3070 standard frame = 3′-4 3/8″ x 7′-2 3/16″). The installer carries the responsibility for shimming and aligning as necessary. Gaps are normally sealed as part of the installation or caulking/painting process. Architectural Specifications are to be consulted to determine the appropriate sealant material to be used at fire door or smoke control frames.
Frame Installation in Cast-in-Place Concrete Walls: While the use of hollow metal frames in cast-in-place concrete walls is a common construction practice, the SDI does not recommend the inclusion of the frame as part of the process of pouring the wall. Instead, a rough-opening should be blocked out no less than 3/16″ (4.8 mm) larger than the frame on all three sides. For example the opening for a 3′-0″ x 7′-0″ standard frame with 2″ faces would be 3′-4 3/8″ x 7′-2 3/16″ minimum. The installer is responsible for anchoring the frame per the manufacturer’s installation instructions, shimming and aligning as necessary.
All values which do not carry specific tolerances or are not marked maximum or minimum shall have the following tolerances: Linear dimensions shall be ± 1/16 in. (1.6 mm). Weight or force shall be ± 2%. Angles shall be ± 2 degrees. Where only minus tolerances are given, the dimensions are permitted to be exceeded at the option of the manufacturers.
Environmental Considerations Relating to Factory Painted Steel Doors and Frames
There is an Industry need for a comprehensive revision of specifications, practices and procedures that will allow compliance with existing and future regulations. The Member Companies of the Steel Door Institute have taken the steps needed to eliminate from their primers, those elements identified by Regulatory Authorities as hazardous to human health and the environment. This is not only a moral responsibility toward society, but also a survival responsibility toward the business. The SDI encourages specification writers to look at these issues very carefully when they specify coating requirements.
Federal and State Laws have regulated the management of hazardous waste so as to not pose a threat to the environment or human health. Environmental Protection Agencies are very strict in regulations that affect coating applications, by limiting the emission to the atmosphere of the amount of VOC (Volatile Organic Compound), which has curtailed the use of solvent base paints.
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (Title III) sets up the reporting requirements in the metal fabricating industry for all wastes containing any listed toxic chemical, which affects the use of heavy metals (such as Zinc-Chromates) as rust inhibitors.
Borrowed light assemblies, transom, sidelight, and combination transom sidelight frames are not factory sealed to prevent water penetration. In situations where water penetration is a concern, the contractor must seal all joints that are exposed to the elements after the frame assembly is installed.
Whenever possible, it is strongly recommended that glass and glazing be installed on the exterior rabbet of the frame assembly. This will help act as a deterrent to water penetration.
The member companies of the hollow metal industry cannot control the workmanship associated with the frame installation; therefore, it is the responsibility of the installer to assure all steps are taken to prevent water penetration.
Grouting Frames in Drywall
Some Architectural Specifications require frames in stud and drywall partitions to be filled with grout for sound deadening or to enhance structural integrity.
The STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE is opposed to this practice for the following reasons:
- In drywall construction, this moisture has two places to go. It can soak into the drywall, potentially destroying its cohesive integrity and thus the ability to retain anchors or frame integrity, or it can leach downward where it will cause premature rusting of anchors, screws, stud connections, bottom of frames, etc.
- Grouting does not appreciably afford any additional structural rigidity to the frame. As an example, slip-on drywall frames have passed fire and hose stream tests, cycle tests, and in some cases impact tests without being grouted.
- If the intention is for sound deadening, SDI 128-19 (Section 3) should be consulted. In addition, the same insulation as used between wall studs (generally lightly packed fiberglass) will serve as a sound deadener without the potential for damage to the frame or wallboard.
It is therefore the opinion of the STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE that grouting should never be specified for drywall construction.
Back-Coating of Frames
Some Architectural Specifications require steel frames to be back-coated with a “bituminous” coating for corrosion protection and sound control. The term “Bituminous” is defined as an asphalt or tar material obtained as a residue from heat refined petroleum. For years it was not recommended by Steel Door Institute for frames to be factory back-coated. This procedure was to be done at the jobsite by the contractor or appropriate trade immediately prior to installation of the frame.
Modern materials available today offer manufacturers the opportunity to back-coat frames with a more user friendly and environmentally sound product. Some of these coatings are free of VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) and can also easily be used to touch up frames that are welded on-site.
For corrosion protection, ANSI/SDI A250.11-2012 paragraph 2.2.1 clearly states that “the contractor responsible for installation” applies corrosion resistant coatings only where specified for anti-freeze agents in the mortar. “Anti-freeze agents are accelerators (e.g. – calcium chloride) intended to increase the rate of mortar strength development not reduce the freezing point of mortar. The Steel Door Institute recommends not using any accelerating additives to the mortar used to back-fill or grout frames. ANSI/SDI A250.11-2012, paragraph 2.3.2 states that “grout shall be mixed to provide a 4″ maximum slump”. Grout mixed to a thinner consistency has excessive moisture and requires longer cure times which increase the potential for corrosion.
Improper Wedges as Hold-Opens
It has come to the attention of the Steel Door Institute (SDI) that cleaning or maintenance personnel have been incorrectly wedging doors to hold them open. This has been reported mainly in health care or hotel-motel installations at patient rooms, utility rooms, sleeping rooms, and even stairways.
Instead of using rubber wedges at the bottom of doors or suitable hold-open mechanisms, wedges of various materials have been inserted between the hinge edge of the door and the hinge jamb. This practice puts an abnormal stress on the hinge reinforcements, hinge knuckles, and attachment screws causing potential damage to any or all of these components.
Damage, loosening, or failure resulting from this practice shall not be construed as a door, frame, or hardware defect or warranty issue. The SDI strongly discourages the use of wedges in this manner or any methods for holding doors open that will compromise the fire or life safety integrity of the openings.
The importance of unrestricted closing and latching of door openings in fire situations is further discussed in Sections 9 through 9.5 of SDI-118 “Basic Fire Door Requirements”.
Buyer Beware Steel Doors with Lead-Based Primer
Excessive lead paint in toys has been in the news a great deal lately. Just ask the toy industry about the far reaching impact of selling products that do not comply with federal regulations. U.S. manufacturers, contractors, and end users are aware of the regulations concerning the limitations of lead in paint. Although the toy industry may not have knowingly violated these regulations, it is embroiled in this issue because it didn’t closely regulate the production of these toys in a country where lead in paint is an accepted practice. United States industries need to comply with applicable regulations for all products that they produce, including all components and assemblies that are outsourced to foreign manufacturers.
In light of the issues raised by the toy industry example and others, the Steel Door Institute felt it worthwhile to investigate the lead content of paint contained on steel doors imported into the United States. The investigations were conducted by independent laboratories on randomly selected doors taken from various regions throughout the United States. The results showed that all the doors tested exceed the allowable lead content for paint used in residential and other consumer products. To ensure consumer safety and, to protect the interests of its membership as well as the industry as a whole, SDI believes it is important to bring attention to this issue.
Risks of Using Lead-Based Paint
In addition to the issues associated with non-compliance with the federal statutes and regulations, there are more serious risks associated with manufacturing, importing, buying or selling products that contain lead-based paint. There are significant physical risks associated with ingesting lead by breathing or swallowing lead dust, which can affect workers during construction and installation as well as the ultimate consumers who may come into contact with the surfaces. For example, standard practice for top coat painting steel doors and frames is to rough up the primer on the face of the door with abrasive sheets to improve adhesion to the primer. This practice will release lead dust that could be potentially inhaled by the painter or other workers in the general vicinity. In addition, painting over lead-based paint with non-lead paint is not a long-term solution. Even though the lead-based paint may be covered by non-lead paint, the lead-based paint may continue to loosen from the surface below and create lead dust. The new paint may also partially mix with the lead-based paint, and lead dust will be released when the new paint begins to deteriorate.
Restrictions on the Use of Lead-Based Paint
There are a number of statutory restrictions on the use of lead-based or lead containing paint in the United States. The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-550, October 28, 1992) incorporates the definition of lead-based paint contained in Section 302(C) of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4831), which characterizes any paint that contains more than .5% by weight of lead as “lead-based paint.”
Together, these two statutes prohibit the use of any paint with excessive lead content in new residential structures, and mandate strict disclosure requirements with respect to the lead content of paint in existing dwellings.
The lead content restrictions are even more stringent under the Consumer Product Safety Act, which reduces the threshold for characterization as lead-containing paint to .06% by weight of the total non-volatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film, and prohibits the use of such paint in residences and consumer products.
This prohibition extends to any products that may be used by consumers following an initial sale, including those contained in apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, hotels, parks and any other public places or areas where consumers may have access to the painted surfaces. (Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2057, 2058; 16 C.F.R. 1303.)
Due to the significant potential risks and costs associated with those risks of importing and/or distributing doors containing lead-based paint, the Steel Door Institute feels obligated to alert the industry to the issue and to urge the general public to be aware of the products that they are associated with, so that they can monitor compliance with all applicable laws.
The Steel Door Institute does not make any assertions or conclusions other than those specifically contained herein, which are limited in scope and used for illustrative purposes only.